In a last-minute twist, the Senate’s efforts to avoid a government shutdown hit a roadblock as Senator Lindsey Graham (R-S.C.) placed a hold on the funding package, demanding votes on a sanctuary cities bill and expanded lawsuit rights for surveillance targets. This move has forced Senate leaders to postpone the vote on the so-called minibus, which had been anticipated after a deal was reached earlier in the day and endorsed by President Trump.
NexSoukFinancial insights you can trust
Graham’s objection centers around his push for votes on two key issues: a sanctuary cities bill and expanded lawsuit rights for individuals targeted by surveillance. The sanctuary cities bill aims to address the issue of local jurisdictions limiting cooperation with federal immigration enforcement, a topic that has been a point of contention between Democrats and Republicans. Additionally, the expanded lawsuit rights for surveillance targets would impact the legal recourse available to individuals affected by government surveillance activities.
The Senate’s race against the clock to pass the funding package before the midnight deadline has been complicated by Graham’s actions. While the Senate is expected to vote on the spending deal after Graham secured GOP leaders’ backing for his priorities, the delay caused by his hold has injected uncertainty into the process.
The political implications of Graham’s move are significant, as it underscores the ongoing debates surrounding immigration policy and government surveillance. The clash over sanctuary cities and surveillance rights reflects broader ideological divisions within Congress and the country as a whole.
As the Senate navigates these challenges, the fate of the funding package hangs in the balance. The outcome of the upcoming vote will determine whether the government can avert a shutdown and continue its operations.
In conclusion, Senator Lindsey Graham’s objection to the Senate funding deal over his demands for votes on sanctuary cities and expanded lawsuit rights for surveillance targets has thrown a wrench into the legislative process. The resolution of these issues will have far-reaching implications for immigration policy and civil liberties in the United States.
References:
1. The Hill: [Senate shutdown deal stalls over Graham objection](https://thehill.com/homenews/senate/5714316-senate-government-funding-shutdown/)
2. Fox News: [Reporter’s Notebook: Senate funding deal hits snag as Graham presses sanctuary city vote](https://www.foxnews.com/politics/reporters-notebook-senate-funding-deal-hits-snag-graham-presses-sanctuary-city-vote)
3. Politico: [Senate expected to repeal law allowing lawmakers to sue over data seizures](https://news.google.com/rss/articles/CBMiqwFBVV95cUxNSUpUaHdUcmFxNVFTclJyZjdHVzVDUnZDZkpGNzAwYXJ6UkVEWkZ0WndVVTcwRnpqNU5TYmN4OVNfemdjd01tZ2U2cjJxR21Yb3d0dk1VQ1BNX0FyNzV1clZ2a1Y0WVpHdUNvdzk0VzlXWWUwbXR2Uk9ERndLMUdMUExxSFh3Q2d3dGQydTFLVmtScEFma2ZEUnJTaVpjT3p5Z2hqY3IwUTJwckU?oc=5&hl=en-US&gl=US&ceid=US:en
Political Bias Index: Neutral
#NexSouk #AIForGood #EthicalAI #SenateFunding #GovernmentShutdown
Social Commentary influenced the creation of this article.
🔗 Share or Link to This Page
Use the link below to share or embed this post:
