In a significant move, the Vatican has decided not to participate in President Donald Trump’s “Board of Peace” initiative, expressing reservations about its potential impact on the United Nations. The Vatican’s decision comes amidst growing global attention on the new board’s objectives and implications for international peace efforts.
According to a report by The Washington Times, the Vatican stated that joining Trump’s Board of Peace could potentially undermine the authority and effectiveness of the United Nations, a key global institution dedicated to promoting peace and security. The Vatican’s stance underscores the delicate balance of power and influence in global diplomacy, particularly in the context of emerging initiatives that seek to reshape international conflict management.
On the eve of the inaugural meeting of the Board of Peace in Washington, historian and UN expert Alanna O’Malley shared insights with FRANCE 24, highlighting the board’s alignment with the “MAGA” (Make America Great Again) movement’s agenda. O’Malley suggested that the board reflects a broader strategy to institutionalize US power on a global scale, potentially challenging the existing frameworks established by the United Nations.
Meanwhile, The Washington Post reported that President Trump is set to convene officials from over 20 countries to discuss the progress of his peace plan for Gaza during the Board of Peace meeting. Despite efforts to garner support and funding for reconstruction and humanitarian efforts in Gaza, there are lingering challenges and uncertainties surrounding the plan’s implementation.
The Strait Times emphasized the White House’s announcement that member states have pledged more than $5 billion for Gaza reconstruction and humanitarian aid, signaling a significant financial commitment to the peace initiative. However, the focus has now shifted to the second phase of the plan, which includes disarming Hamas and addressing broader regional security concerns.
As President Trump launches the Board of Peace with global ambitions beyond Gaza, the initiative’s implications for international diplomacy and conflict resolution remain subject to scrutiny and debate. The Vatican’s decision not to participate underscores the complexities and nuances of navigating diplomatic relationships and multilateral cooperation in an increasingly interconnected world.
In conclusion, the Vatican’s refusal to join Trump’s Board of Peace highlights the delicate balance between emerging initiatives and established international institutions like the United Nations. As global leaders convene to address peace and security challenges, the dynamics of power, influence, and cooperation will continue to shape the future of international relations.
Political Bias Index: Neutral
References:
1. The Washington Times: https://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2026/feb/18/vatican-wont-join-trumps-board-peace-says-undermines-un/
2. FRANCE 24: https://www.france24.com/en/americas/20260218-very-maga-agenda-trump-board-of-peace-meant-to-replace-the-united-nations
3. The Washington Post: https://www.washingtonpost.com/national-security/2026/02/18/trump-board-of-peace-gaza/
4. The Strait Times: https://www.straitstimes.com/world/united-states/over-20-countries-will-attend-trumps-board-of-peace-meeting-on-thursday-white-house-says
Hashtags: #NexSouk #AIForGood #EthicalAI #GlobalDiplomacy #InternationalRelations
Social Commentary influenced the creation of this article.
🔗 Share or Link to This Page
Use the link below to share or embed this post:
