In a dramatic turn of events, the United States launched a military operation in Venezuela, capturing President Nicolas Maduro and his wife, Cilia Flores, and detaining them in New York. This action has sparked a wave of international reactions, with China, the United Nations, and the Kremlin condemning the US for its breach of international law and sovereignty.
NexSoukFinancial insights you can trust
China, a close ally of Venezuela, has called for Maduro’s immediate release and accused the US of violating international norms. Chinese Foreign Minister Wang Yi criticized the US for acting as the world’s policeman and condemned the military strikes on Venezuela as a serious violation of sovereignty. This stance reflects China’s commitment to non-interference in the internal affairs of other countries.
On the other hand, the US has justified its actions by citing a newly unsealed indictment that accuses Maduro of running a corrupt government fueled by a drug-trafficking operation that flooded the US with cocaine. The US President, Donald Trump, declared that the US would oversee Venezuela until a “safe, proper, and judicious” transition takes place. This move has raised concerns about the implications of foreign military intervention in a sovereign state.
The United Nations Secretary-General has expressed deep concern over the potential escalation of instability in Venezuela following the US military intervention. He emphasized the importance of respecting the UN Charter and the prohibition of the use of force against the territory and independence of any state. The UN’s stance underscores the need for diplomatic solutions to address the crisis in Venezuela.
Meanwhile, the Kremlin has also condemned the US military operation in Venezuela, drawing parallels to Russia’s failed military intervention in Kyiv four years ago. This condemnation highlights the geopolitical tensions surrounding the situation in Venezuela and raises questions about the implications for global security and stability.
The Chicago Teachers Union’s support for socialist-led protests advocating for regime change in Venezuela adds another layer of complexity to the situation. The involvement of various actors with diverse interests underscores the multifaceted nature of the crisis in Venezuela and the challenges of finding a peaceful resolution.
In conclusion, the US military intervention in Venezuela has triggered a global outcry, with China, the United Nations, and the Kremlin expressing strong opposition to the breach of international law and sovereignty. The situation in Venezuela remains fluid, with implications for regional stability and international relations.
Political Bias Index: Neutral
References:
1. https://www.scmp.com/news/china/diplomacy/article/3338661/china-calls-maduros-immediate-release-accuses-us-breaching-international-law?utm_source=rss_feed
2. https://www.smh.com.au/world/south-america/how-cocaine-and-corruption-led-to-maduro-s-indictment-according-to-us-20260105-p5nrmy.html?ref=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_source=rss_world
3. https://www.globalissues.org/news/2026/01/05/42038
4. https://www.npr.org/2026/01/05/nx-s1-5666267/kremlin-condemns-u-s-military-operation-in-venezuela
5. https://internewscast.com/news/us/chicago-teachers-union-supports-socialist-led-protests-advocating-for-regime-change-in-venezuela/
Hashtags: #NexSouk #AIForGood #EthicalAI #GlobalPolitics #VenezuelaCrisis
Social Commentary influenced the creation of this article.
🔗 Share or Link to This Page
Use the link below to share or embed this post:
