Maine Democratic Senate candidate Graham Platner has found himself embroiled in controversy after a tattoo on his chest resembling a skull-and-crossbones, which some have associated with Nazi symbolism, came to light. Platner, a former marine, explained in a video interview with Pod Save America that he and his fellow marines got matching tattoos at a parlor in Split, Croatia, in 2007 while deployed overseas. He claimed that the decision was made while they were “very inebriated” and that he was unaware of the historical associations of the symbol at the time.
Platner has been proactive in addressing the issue, acknowledging the concerns raised and stating that he plans to have the tattoo removed. He emphasized that he is not a Nazi and that the tattoo was a result of youthful indiscretion and ignorance. Despite the controversy, Platner remains committed to his Senate bid and has taken a page from the Trump playbook by doubling down on his candidacy.
The situation has garnered significant attention, with various media outlets covering the story. Politico reported on Platner’s decision to remove the tattoo and his efforts to distance himself from old Reddit posts that have drawn criticism. The Guardian also covered the story, highlighting Platner’s assertion that he is not a secret Nazi and his plans to address the issue head-on. Additionally, Axios reported on Platner’s response to the accusations, where he reiterated his commitment to removing the tattoo and clarifying his stance on the matter.
In the midst of the controversy, Platner’s political opponents have seized on the opportunity to criticize him. Bernie Sanders, in a recent interaction with a reporter, attempted to deflect attention by referencing Platner’s military tours, further fueling the debate surrounding the tattoo.
As the story continues to unfold, it raises questions about the impact of personal decisions and past actions on political candidates. Platner’s handling of the situation and his willingness to address the issue directly will likely play a significant role in shaping public perception and support for his candidacy.
Overall, the controversy surrounding Graham Platner’s tattoo highlights the complexities of personal history and the scrutiny that political candidates face in today’s media landscape. While the situation has sparked debate and criticism, Platner’s response and actions moving forward will be crucial in determining the outcome of his Senate bid.
Political Bias Index: Neutral
References:
1. Daily Caller: https://dailycaller.com/2025/10/21/graham-platner-maine-nazi-symbol-tattoo-susan-collins-reddit/
2. The Guardian: https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2025/oct/21/maine-graham-platner-tattoo-democrat-senate
3. Axios: https://news.google.com/rss/articles/CBMigwFBVV95cUxNbFI1YV9pY3VOY2o0X1IwWlNjYVVlMm5aVzhOQjNXS1hULTcxWkRMVXdSZk12cm5ha2l2MkdnRVFqeVlic0s3SXBSUzg5SEtJbXNldlBtXzB3TkJNOXl0U3g4eDExUzU1ajU5R2xLWVZLMTJ2WXBqcWlxdDBoU0FWUXZSUQ
Hashtags: #NexSouk #AIForGood #EthicalAI #MaineSenate #GrahamPlatner
Social Commentary influenced the creation of this article.
🔗 Share or Link to This Page
Use the link below to share or embed this post:
